After reading the Payne text and reviewing the accompanying videos and articles, you should have clearer understandings about her framework and what others say about her premises. Which end of the continuum (strongly disagree, disagree, agree, strongly agree) do you tend to favor? Why? Support your points with references.
This is the second time that I have had to read the Ruby Payne text for a class. The first time that I read the book I strongly disagreed with the book and many of the points made in the book. I gave it another try as it has been several years since I read it, and read the entire book again. I kept my mind open and considered more deeply the points that she makes. Surprise, I strongly disagreed with the book again. There was a difference between my feelings about the book now and those I had several years ago. The first time I read the book it actually made me angry. As a person who grew up in poverty, I took it very personal. The second time I read it, I actually was able to pull out a couple of good points from the reading and things that I will try to implement in my classroom.
The main reason I have for disagreeing with this book is that I feel that it is over generalized and promotes stereotypes of those that live in poverty. The book does not talk much about the individual or point out that it is much more important to look at each individual situation than a group of people as a whole. This is especially important for those in situational poverty. Many of these people may have an education, know the hidden rules of the middle class and can speak in formal register. It would be very insulting to approach them in the manner Payne suggests. For a person coming into the field of teaching, who has never had an experience with people from poverty before, I feel this book could lead them in the wrong direction for dealing with students from poverty.
I have often wondered since my first reading of Payne’s book why it is so highly regarded and so often recommended reading for teachers and administrators. Bohn’s (Fall, 2007) article makes several good points about why this is the case. The first point she makes is that the book is easy to understand and makes us feel good. As educators, we are always looking for ways to better reach those hard to reach students. Students from poverty often have so many things going on outside of school that they are difficult to reach. This book on the surface makes one feel as if they can use these tools to better reach these kids. For those who agree with this book it seems like the answer to so many classroom issues regarding the culture of poverty. Another strong point that Bohn (Fall, 2007) makes is that there just aren’t a whole lot of resources available that discuss this issue. While it is an issue we all know exists, there has not been a lot written on the topic.
In reading the criticisms of Payne’s work, one of the strongest points I found was in the article written by Dr.Rury. In the article Rury (2006, July), discusses the fact that in almost all of Payne’s scenarios there are people engaging in questionable moral behavior. Even if the main character is an innocent child, they have fallen victim to the questionable moral character of an adult. These scenarios give the impression that all people from poverty either engage in questionable moral behavior or are victims of it. I believe this is dangerous for those who have come from a middle class background and may not have any experience with those from poverty. It gives a certain impression of a whole group of people that is not true.
Bohn, Anita Perna. (2007, Fall) Revisiting Ruby Payne. Rethinking Schools Online.
22 (1) p. 1-4.
Ng, J. C., & Rury, J. L. (2006, July). Poverty and education: A critical analysis of
the Ruby Payne phenomenon. Teachers College Record. Retrieved from
http://www.tcrecord.org [ID Number: 12596]